For most South Dakotans, it’s a thrill to see their state pictured or mentioned on the big screen. Think Kevin Costner’s epic “Dances with Wolves” or Pauly Shore’s slapstick rom-com “Son in Law” or the recent Academy Award-winning “Nomadland,” just to name a few.
The film “Plan B,” which recently debuted on Hulu, joins the ranks of films with a South Dakota storyline. “Plan B” tells the story of two teens who embark on a road trip through South Dakota in search of the morning-after pill after a condom breaks. The teens cannot access the Plan B pill on their own because of the state’s law allowing pharmacists to deny medication to South Dakotans. South Dakota is one of six states in the country that has a “conscience clause” regarding emergency contraception. A pharmacist can refuse to give Plan B to any patient – including adults.
Because a pharmacist refuses to prescribe the medication, the two girls then decide to drive to the place they know they can access care: Planned Parenthood. They drive to Rapid City, only to find the Planned Parenthood health center closed – a plot point that helps advance the hijinks of the movie.
Planned Parenthood closed its Rapid City location because of budget challenges in 2014. Now the state’s only Planned Parenthood location is in Sioux Falls.
“A lot of people think that just abortion care is difficult to access in South Dakota, but this film really shows the many obstacles to all kinds of sexual and reproductive health care,” said Kristin Hayward, manager of advocacy in South Dakota for Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota Action Fund. “South Dakota law limits emergency contraception, birth control, even condoms. The laws limit access to minors the most, and it makes it really, really hard for South Dakotans to get the health care they need. The movie is a comedy – and there are lots of funny parts – but the issues are serious. South Dakotans have to face these hurdles to health care every single day.”
“Plan B” isn’t meant to be a lecture on reproductive rights. But, that it happens to take place in South Dakota– one of six states with only one abortion provider– is a reminder work to ensure that people can make the best decisions for themselves and their family without political interference continues.
This year, South Dakota legislators passed two anti-abortion bills– one that would require doctors to give information to patients about a so-called “abortion reversal” and one that would ban abortions based on a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome.
Comments