March 4, 2025:
The South Dakota Senate Education Committee has rejected (March 4, 2025) a bill that would’ve cut state funding for high school dual credit programs.
House Bill 1040, which proposed reducing the state’s share from 67% to 50%, failed on a 4-3 vote.
Secretary of Education Joe Graves said the change would have saved the state about $1.2 million next year. Opponents argued the current funding structure is crucial to the program’s success.
The Senate Education Committee approved House Bill 1039, which limits new entries into teacher and counselor national certification reimbursement programs after July 1, 2025.
The committee also tabled a bill that would have permitted merit pay for teachers.
This story is courtesy of the South Dakota Broadcasters Association.
February 11, 2025:
South Dakota legislators have deferred discussion (Feb. 11, 2025) on a proposal to reduce state spending on a high school dual credit program.
House Bill 1040 would reduce the state’s contribution to subsidized dual credit courses for high school students from 66.7% to 50% of tuition costs. Education groups opposed the measure, saying the current program benefits families and accelerates students into the workforce.
“If we can fast track some of these kids through their college or tech programs and get them into the workforce, it is a huge benefit for the state of South Dakota,” said Rob Monson, executive director of School Administrators of South Dakota.
State Education Secretary Joseph Graves said reducing the state subsidy to 50% will not likely deter participation but it will save about $1.1 million. The current per-credit cost is $157.11, with students paying $50.84 and the state $101.70.
A committee member asked for clarification, “So basically what you’re saying is that the cost to the student would go to about $75, $76. Is that correct?”
“Mr. Chair, yes, that is correct,” replied Cody Stoeser of the Department of Education.
HB 1040 will be brought up again later this legislative session.
This story is courtesy of the South Dakota Broadcasters Association.
Comments