Dec. 3, 2025:
Stuck in the Mud by Rep. Will Mortenson (R-Fort Pierre) (December 3, 2025)
South Dakota has real cause for concern. On December 2, Governor Rhoden put forth his budget proposal for 2026. The news is bleak. Our state sales tax collections went backward for only the 3rd time in the last 30 years, and education, nursing homes, and state employees will see 0% increases. After years of growth and advancement, it seems that South Dakota is stuck in the mud.
The state budget is a general proxy for our state’s economy. Because we are largely a Sales-Tax state, the ongoing revenues of state government provide a reflection of economic activity from year-to-year. Despite 3.0% inflation (or so), our revenues actually declined 0.6% last year. Consider that: if we would have just had the same economic activity as the year before, we would have grown by 3.0%. Instead, we went backward.
Do not get me wrong: we should not be spending for spending’s sake. While I understand it will be a belt-tightening year for our schools, hospitals, and law enforcement, I am more concerned about what this budget reflects about the condition of our state. Gov. Rhoden noted that his budget will be the first in state history where South Dakota spends more on Medicaid than on K-12 education. That should be a deeply troubling statistic for anyone who cares about the future of our state.
Unfortunately, the stagnation we see in the state budget was foreseeable. Lately, many in the legislature and in local governments have focused on what government can block rather than what South Dakotans can build. In 2013, South Dakota was the #1 ranked state for business. Today, using the same metrics and from the same entity, we are ranked #35. Worse than no plan, our economic policy has been that of big-government protection rather than people-first prosperity.
We don’t need tours, rallies, politics, or gladhanding. We need a real, clear plan for better wages, more growth, and a robust economy. South Dakota has always prided itself on our independence, our work ethic, and our common-sense values. If we want to ensure that our kids can raise their families here, that opportunity still lives on our main streets, and that our best days are ahead, we need to make prosperity a priority again.
After years of strength, the Rhoden budget reflects sluggishness and an economy that is stuck in the mud. We need to get back-on-track, with budget priorities that focus on the future and a plan for prosperity for generations to come. The news out of the Capitol was bleak this week, but it does not need to remain that way. We can do better, and we must.
Oct. 22, 2025:
The Simple Solution to Property Taxes by Rep. Will Mortenson (R-Fort Pierre) (October 21, 2025)
Property taxes are irritating. The tax notice comes in the mail twice a year, showing that you owe the county treasurer hundreds, thousands, or (if you’re lucky and own very valuable property) tens of thousands of dollars. You pay property taxes, even though you may have bought your house, farm, or business fifty years ago and paid off the mortgage twenty years ago. Because of the stark, high-dollar reminder and the fact that no transaction has taken place, property taxes represent more of a burr under South Dakotans’ saddles than about any other tax.
So, if we do not like property taxes and we want to pay less of them, how should we go about doing that? It is important to know that the State of South Dakota, your state government, does not spend one dime of property tax revenue. All property taxes are allocated to local governments, with about 90% spent in three areas: Law Enforcement, Schools, and Roads. The dollars are not going to some faceless paper-pusher; property taxes fund your teachers, sheriffs, city streets, and rural bridges. So, any real, responsible plan to reduce property taxes must replace the revenue instead of recklessly suggesting that our schools, cities, or counties simply cut their staff or their road budget by 25%.
The good news: a simple, straightforward solution has already been proposed. Last year, I co-sponsored a bill that would have cut owner-occupied property taxes by 35% for all homeowners without defunding the police, our schools, or our roads. The replacement revenue was an increase in the sales tax rate by 0.8%, moving us from 11th lowest in the nation to 18th lowest, and making our sales tax rate the same as North Dakota (still 1% lower than Nebraska). Despite the support of a couple dozen smart conservatives in the House of Representatives, the bill was opposed by Gov. Rhoden, the Democrats, and House Leadership, and was defeated. If it had passed, the property taxes on your home would be lower by more than one-third in 2026. Remember that when the notice comes this spring.
A consumption tax like the sales tax is the best replacement revenue. It is fair and consistent across the state. It allows frugal, conservative spenders to avoid paying some taxes, if they are willing to consume less. Another benefit: out-of-staters pay sales tax, from truckers passing through to visiting tourists to out-of-state corporations buying goods and services in South Dakota. While it may only account for ten or fifteen percent, tens of millions of dollars would be paid by out-of-staters in sales taxes that are now paid 100% by South Dakota homeowners in property taxes. Owing to that fact, the property-tax-for-sales-tax swap represents a clear and substantial tax cut for South Dakotans.
The best solution for reducing property taxes is a simple, responsible one, that replaces property tax revenue without defunding vital local services. This summer, ideas have been floated, ranging from a State Income Tax to New County Taxes to putting a 16.2% tax on eggs and bread (that last idea is proposed to go in our constitution!). Reducing property taxes for South Dakota homeowners can be achieved, but not at the expense of our law enforcement, not on the backs of our teachers, and not through income taxes or 15%+ taxes on groceries. If we are going to deliver property tax relief and tamp down the irritation of that semiannual tax notice, we need to keep it simple, South Dakota.






All this is, is shifting the tax onto those who can least afford it. The owner of a home/property valued in the 6 plus figure gets to keep more money, while the person who doesn’t own any property and is struggling to make ends meet is supposed to make up the difference. If this should happen to pass, it should definitely not be on grocery food! The state is already seeing sales tax going down, and he thinks this is increase in sales tax is going to replace property taxes!